CLA Govt Library & IM Professionals Network

Building the Canadian library and information community

  • About this site

    This website is managed by the CLA Government Library and Information Management Professionals Network, a unit of the Canadian Library Association / Association canadienne des bibliothèques.
  • Subscribe

  • Archives

  • Categories

Archive for the ‘Research’ Category

Membership of the Expert Panel on The Status and Future of Canada’s Libraries and Archives

Posted by CLA Govt Library and Info Mgmt Professionals Network on 2013/05/21

In March 2013, the Royal Society of Canada established an Expert Panel on The Status and Future of Canada’s Libraries and Archives.

The Expert Panel Report will be published in Fall 2014.

Since the announcement of the panel, details of the panel membership has been published on the RSC website:

Dr. Patricia Demers, FRSC, Chair
Distinguished University Professor in the Department of English and Film Studies and the Comparative Literature Program
University of Alberta

Dr. Guylaine Beaudry
Director, Webster Library
Concordia University

Pam Bjornson
Director General, Knowledge Management
National Research Council

Michael Carroll
Professor of Law and Director of the Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
American University Washington College of Law

Carol Couture
Professeur honoraire
Université de Montréal

Charlotte Gray, FRSC
Author and Adjunct Research Professor, Department of History
Carleton University

Judith Hare
Chief Executive Officer
Halifax Public Libraries

Ernie Ingles, FRSC
Vice-Provost and Director, School of Library and Information Studies
University of Alberta

Eric Ketelaar
Professor Emeritus
University of Amsterdam

Gerald McMaster
Curator, Canadian Art
Art Gallery of Ontario

Posted in Research | Leave a Comment »

Focus on… Mê-Linh Lê

Posted by CLA Govt Library and Info Mgmt Professionals Network on 2013/05/15

Highlighting research by members of the Canadian library and information management community.

Mê-Linh Lê

Health Sciences Centre Librarian, Neil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, University of Manitoba

Photo of Mê-Linh Lê

What is your research topic?

My current research focuses on the information needs of public health students.

The troublesome nature of public health information has long been discussed in the literature, due in part to its multidisciplinary nature, poor application of metadata, and the fact that much of it is found in the grey literature. While there has been work done on better serving the needs of public health professionals, there is next to nothing on library services for public health students. Further complicating this is the fact that, at least at the pilot site, many public health students are international students, many of whom may be totally unfamiliar with the way North American libraries are structured (e.g., free access to resources, liaison librarians), and for whom English may not be their first language.

I felt it was important to gain a better understanding of these students with extremely diverse educational backgrounds both to aid in my own professional practice, and in the hopes of encouraging more work in this area.

What interested you in that topic?

I have worked with public health professionals in both governmental and academic settings, and find myself truly fascinated (and overwhelmed!) with the sheer depth and breadth of their knowledge and the answers they are seeking.

As a health sciences librarian I am particularly interested in public health as I can see the direct impact it has on my daily life. For example, public health researchers looking for evidence on the effectiveness of urban speed limits convey their findings to policy makers – which may then result in a change in the speed limit on my street. That direct application of visible evidence to practice drives my interest in public health, and thus motivates my research in ensuring that the complete spectrum of public health workers, from students to researcher, is fully equipped to access the information they need.

What impact would you like to see your research have on LIS practitioners?

My primary objective is to encourage more LIS researchers and practitioners to more closely examine public health information needs and to devise ways in which we can both better serve them and to come up with more effective ways to organize the literature. I am already seeing more work now than I did in the last few years, and that is so encouraging. I am happy on a personal note as it aids me in my daily work (somewhat selfish I know!), but it also means that the evidence base is growing and that our provision of service to these unique users is hopefully getting better as well.

I also hope that my work encourages other health sciences librarians or information professionals to look beyond our traditional user groups (doctors, nurses, pharmacists) and consider the kinds of resources and needs of public health students and workers. For example, a public health research question will not be satisfactorily answered with a quick scan of Medline or CINAHL.

What emerging topics do you foresee in the future of LIS research?

Well, I am not sure if these topics are in the future or already here in full force. One of the topics – the preservation, access, and provision of data and research (seen most clearly in research data management and the open access movement) – is an extremely challenging area with a lot of complexity, but I think librarians, archivists, and records-managers are well-suited to the task and I look forward to seeing where the research goes.

Another area I hope to see receive more attention is the increasingly frustrating world of electronic books. I think everyone – students, librarians, publishers, vendors – are not quite sure where electronic books are going (I often see it likened to a ‘Wild West’) and that can be difficult. I would love to see some work on libraries taking a stronger stance when it comes to eBooks and whether that impacts current eBook models and practices.

What advice would you give to LIS students or practitioners hoping to engage in research?

My best advice is to just get started!

There are so many opportunities out there for new researchers and I think you just have to get over your initial fear and jump right in. Skim the table of contents of journals you currently read – it will give you an idea of the kind of work out there getting published. Not everything has to be groundbreaking or revelatory work. For many librarians some of the most useful papers out there are case studies – which are relatively simple to write up. Start small with things like conference poster or book reviews and go from there. The vast majority of librarians are an extremely encouraging group who thrive on collaboration so start talking with your colleagues or fellow students. They might be working on something and need assistance, or they may be able to fill in a gap in your research project. You never know where a potential project might spring from.

Select Bibliography

Duncan, V., Kumaran, M., Lê, M. and Murphy, S. 2013. Mobile devices and their use in library professional practice: The health librarian and the iPad. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 25(3). [Forthcoming].

Lê, M. 2013. Information needs of public health staff in a knowledge translation setting in Canada. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 34(01): 3-11, 10.5596/c13-001.

Lê, M. 2012. The use of anonymous pop-quizzes (APQs) as a tool to reinforce learning. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 100(4): 316–319, 10.3163/1536-5050.100.4.017.

Posted in Focus On, People, Research | Leave a Comment »

Focus On… Jorden Smith

Posted by CLA Govt Library and Info Mgmt Professionals Network on 2013/05/01

Jorden Smith

Public Services Librarian, University of Alberta Libraries

Photo of Jorden Smith

What is your research topic?

My research projects generally focus on information literacy (IL), including two current projects involving undergraduate researchers and pre-service teachers. I am working with the University of Alberta’s Undergraduate Research Initiative to examine how undergraduate researchers find the information they need for all aspects of the research process as a means to explore ways the library can provide effective support.

I am also undertaking a project with a former colleague in Education where we are evaluating how pre-service teachers find the information and images necessary to inform and present a digital Canadian historical narrative presented from an Aboriginal or French-Canadian perspective.

What interested you in that topic?

What really got me into information literacy was my experience teaching junior high Social Studies. Information literacy permeates the curriculum and inquiry-based projects and provides engaging learning opportunities, but it was a struggle to find ways to offer meaningful and differentiated IL instruction in a classroom. I had a student write a report on Russian worldviews but she used a 1962 World Book Encyclopedia as her source, and it was an eye-opening moment for me. Many of the students had little-to-no experience locating, accessing, and using information for academic purposes, so the notion of currency did not factor into this student’s choice of resource. During library school I opted to do a thesis which gave me the opportunity to explore some of the questions that arose during my teaching experience. It continues to be a focal point for me and a source of continued interest.

What impact would you like to see your research have on LIS practitioners?

I hope it helps others develop informed practices and studies. I’ve learned so much from the work of other LIS professionals. Ultimately, I hope it encourages others to pursue the questions that intrigue them.

What emerging topics do you foresee in the future of LIS research?

Where to start!? There are so many interesting questions and means of exploring them. In the future, I think there will be greater use of visual, narrative, and community-based research methods within LIS. What I really hope to see is a study of the correlation between librarian cardigan-wearing and perceptions of cognitive authority.

What advice would you give to LIS students or practitioners hoping to engage in research?

When you have a question that excites you, pursue it. It may be a tough slog at times but it is worth the effort. Finding a great collaborator goes a long way. I’ve been very lucky and have worked with wonderful people who’ve made my research experiences all the more rewarding.

Select Bibliography

Smith, Jorden, Kathleen DeLong, Lisa Given, Heidi Julien, and Dana Ouellette. 2013. “Information Literacy Proficiency: Assessing the Gap in High School Students’ Readiness for Undergraduate Academic Work.” Library and Information Science Research 35 (2): 88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2012.12.001

Smith, Jorden. “Secondary Teachers and Information Literacy (IL): Their Understanding and Perceptions of IL within their Classrooms.” Library and Information Science Research (Forthcoming, 2013).

Smith, Jorden. “Examining Secondary School Teacher Understanding of Information Literacy.” Master’s thesis, University of Alberta, 2011. ProQuest (MR89937).

Posted in Focus On, People, Research | Leave a Comment »

Focus On… Melissa Fraser-Arnott

Posted by CLA Govt Library and Info Mgmt Professionals Network on 2013/04/17

Focus On… is a new feature on the CLA Government Library and Information Management Professionals Network website.

Each month we will profile research by a member of the Canadian library and IM community.

Melissa Fraser-Arnott

Doctoral Student, Queensland University of Technology (SJSU Gateway PhD Program)

Photo of Melissa Fraser-Arnott

What is your research topic?

I am studying the professional identities of library and information science (LIS) graduates in non-traditional roles. Non-traditional jobs for LIS graduates may include positions outside of libraries and in other industry sectors; new or unusual job titles, such as metadata specialist or data analyst; or jobs with traditional titles (such as librarian) in traditional settings such as libraries or archives but which involve new tasks such as working with emerging technologies or offering new, value added information services. A professional identity is a particular type of identity that is focused on an individual’s sense of self in relation to their occupation, work or professional life.

What interested you in that topic?

Most of my career to date has involved non-traditional roles. I have been a “hidden librarian” performing librarian-type tasks such as alert services, information resource building, and technology training in a non-library environment (as a Commercial Officer in a government department); a librarian in a non-traditional library setting (an electronic library that built its collection through content partnerships with non-governmental organizations with Creative Commons licenses); and as a librarian in a traditional library setting engaged in non-traditional tasks (I’m the office SharePoint expert and have provided information management guidance on content projects). Taking on these types of roles that seemed very different from what my colleagues in public and academic libraries were doing made me think about my role and the roles of others in positions like mine in the larger LIS community.

What impact would you like to see your research have on LIS practitioners?

I think that exploring the experiences of LIS graduates in non-traditional roles can help LIS schools and professional associations in developing professional development programming for LIS graduates that open up a new range of employment opportunities.

Like many others in our profession, I believe that the information-related skill set that we possess can allow us to add value to a number of environments, but that employers are not always aware of the range of an LIS graduates capabilities, especially when they continue to associate our profession only with books and traditional library services.

I hope that my work will help LIS practitioners in the pursuit of non-traditional, alternative, or unusual career opportunities.

What emerging topics do you foresee in the future of LIS research?

Library and information science is a very rich field that is tied to a number of diverse disciplines.

My fellow students in the SJSU-QUT Gateway PhD program are all working on fascinating research topics that combine research from multiple disciplines. For example, we have PhD students working on information hoarding in cloud computing recordkeeping environments, use of web 2.0 technologies to facilitate teamwork and information sharing, education strategies for teaching the use of information resources, and library use of influence strategies in obtaining funding to name a few.

As a practitioner, I believe that LIS professionals can best demonstrate their value by showing their role in business operations (i.e. through direct interaction in the workflows of their host organizations). I believe that integration with other disciplines will also be important to our research future.

What advice would you give to LIS students or practitioners hoping to engage in research?

I had dreamed of entering a PhD program since I finished my MLIS degree, but didn’t think that I’d had enough research experience or exposure to the academic environment to be able to realize that dream. I hadn’t taken the opportunity to do a research project in my Masters’ program and then had worked in special and public libraries rather than academic libraries where scholarly research and publishing are encouraged. Even when working in other types of library environments, however, I had been developing my research, information gathering and writing skills by performing tasks such as preparing research backgrounders, performing information audits, and developing program evaluation tools.

When I applied to the SJSU-QUT Gateway PhD program they considered these types of research experiences valuable even though I didn’t have a scholarly publishing portfolio. The advice, therefore, that I would give an LIS student or practitioner hoping to engage in research is to go out and try it – whether it is publishing an article for a peer-reviewed or non-peer-reviewed journal, holding a conference session, or even applying for a PhD program. As long as you have an idea that you believe is worth researching there are ways to get the research work done.

Posted in Focus On, People, Research | Leave a Comment »

Focus On… Denise Koufogiannakis

Posted by CLA Govt Library and Info Mgmt Professionals Network on 2013/03/20

Focus On… is a new feature on the CLA Government Library and Information Management Professionals Network website.

Each month we will profile research by a member of the Canadian library and IM community.

Denise Koufogiannakis, MLIS, PhD

Collections & Acquisitions Coordinator, University of Alberta Libraries

Denise Koufogiannakis

What is your research topic?

I’m very interested in evidence based library and information practice, as well as research about research within LIS. My most recent study was about how academic librarians use evidence in their decision making.

What interested you in that topic?

Ever since my first professional job as a health sciences librarian, I’ve been interested in how librarians make decisions in practice, and how we might be able to make better decisions by using research. This has led me to think about how we can make our research better, the dissemination of research within LIS, and the factors that contribute to how and why we use research and other forms of evidence in our decision making.

What impact would you like to see your research have on LIS practitioners?

I’d like my research to help my fellow practitioners have a better understanding of why we make decisions in the way we do, and to understand how we might improve our decision making. Ultimately, this should lead to the provision of better services for our communities.

What emerging topics do you foresee in the future of LIS research?

There are so many! Every day leads to new questions! I’m a very practical person, so I hope that as a profession we will continue to do research that has direct application to how we provide services, but also measures the worth of what we do. It seems that at this point in time, all libraries are being asked to prove their value, and research studies can help with that. Research can also help us to realize when we should stop providing certain services.

What advice would you give to LIS students or practitioners hoping to engage in research?

My advice is to follow what interests you and just get started! Don’t put too much pressure on yourself – your skills will improve over time. Find a mentor who can help guide you, and also look for collaborators. Research always seems to be stronger when done in a group!

Select Bibliography

Denise Koufogiannakis (2012) Academic Librarians’ Conception and Use of Evidence Sources in Practice, 5-24. In Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 7 (4).

Lorie A. Kloda, Denise Koufogiannakis, Katrine Mallan (2011) Transferring evidence into practice: what evidence summaries of library and information studies research tell practitioners. In Information Research 6 (1).

Denise Koufogiannakis, Natasha Wiebe (2006) Effective Methods for Teaching Information Literacy Skills to Undergraduate Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 3-43. In Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 1 (3).

Denise Koufogiannakis, Ellen Crumley, Linda Slater (2004) A Content Analysis of Librarianship Research, 227-239. In Journal of Information Science 30 (3).

Posted in Focus On, People, Research | Leave a Comment »

Call for Volunteers: CLA Library Statistics and Values Task Force

Posted by CLA Govt Library and Info Mgmt Professionals Network on 2013/03/16

The Canadian Library Association (CLA) Executive Council is seeking volunteers to contribute to the CLA Library Statistics and Values Task Force.

Working from the National Statistical and Values Profile of Canadian Libraries prepared by Dr. Alvin Schrader and Michael Brundin, this Task Force will develop strategies to implement the report’s recommended actions and develop advocacy tools using the value statements and statistics.

We are seeking library staff from various library sectors and geographic regions to participate on this Task Force for a six-month term (with possibility of extension). Interested individuals should be experienced in assessment, research, and marketing and have excellent written communication skills.

If you are interested, please complete the Call for Volunteers Form. Your statement of interest should describe your experience, why you are interested, and how you would contribute to this exciting CLA initiative.

Expressions of interest should be sent no later than 2 April to kmoore@cla.ca.

CLA Library Statistics and Values Task Force Terms of Reference

A Task Force has been established by CLA Executive Council to develop strategies for the association based on the recommendations from the National Statistical and Values Profile of Canadian Libraries by Alvin M. Schrader and Michael R. Brundin, and to develop advocacy tools for laypersons using the rich data from this report. The terms of reference for the committee include the following actions:

  • recommend strategies for developing common operational definitions for valid, reliable, inclusive data, especially in the area of e-measures
  • recommend strategies for developing an open access clearinghouse to share library performance measures (qualitative and quantitative) and local research into library impacts and outcomes
  • investigate the availability of studies on the economic benefit, return on investment and overall value of libraries in society, and make recommendations for future studies and use of these studies
  • Develop draft infograpics and other visually appealing presentations of selected data provided in the “National Statistical and Values Profile of Canadian Libraries” (could include postcards, tables and other tools for advocacy purposes)

Members
We are seeking 3-5 individuals to work with CLA President Pilar Martinez and CLA Councillor Jane Schmidt on this Task Force.

Liaison
Alvin Schrader

Resource document
National Statistical and Values Profile of Canadian Libraries

Report to
Executive Council

Timeline
Final report due end September 2013

Posted in Research, Statistics | Leave a Comment »

Royal Society of Canada Announces Expert Panel on The Status and Future of Canada’s Libraries and Archives

Posted by CLA Govt Library and Info Mgmt Professionals Network on 2013/03/07

From the Royal Society of Canada website:

Since the 1950s debate has raged about the impact of new technologies on print culture in the broadest sense and on the publishing industry, libraries, and archives in particular. Succinctly put, “The Death of the Book” has been both proclaimed and denied. Meanwhile, notions of what constitutes a library or an archive have been challenged and transformed by new communications competencies and needs. In response to these realities, the Royal Society of Canada is establishing an Expert Panel on “The Status and Future of Canada’s Libraries and Archives”.

The Expert Panel Report will be published in Fall 2014.

Membership

Chair

Patricia Demers, Distinguished University Professor in the Department of English and Film Studies and the Comparative Literature Program at the University of Alberta

Members

Ernie Ingles, Director & Executive Professor, School of Information Studies at the University of Alberta

Additional members to be announced

Oversight Committee

Keith Banting, Department of Political Studies and the School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University

Patricia Demers, Department of English and Film Studies, University of Alberta

Len Findlay, College of Arts & Science, University of Saskatchewan

Sherrill Grace (Chair), Department of English, University of British Columbia

David Layzell, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary

About RSC Expert Panels

For more than 130 years, the RSC has been bringing together scholars and researchers from diverse disciplines to conduct expert, multi-disciplinary investigations on matters of public importance. Beginning in the 1980s, the RSC formalized one aspect of this endeavor by launching Expert Panels operating on the model pioneered by the US National Academy of Sciences. These Expert Panels, struck as a public service to Canadians, have provided insight, advice and recommendations to Canadian governments, industry and NGOs on public policy matters ranging from the health effects of asbestos to early childhood education. The work of the RSC’s Expert Panels ensures that there is independent, comprehensive, and evidenced-based input into the public policy development process in Canada.

More information available on the RSC website.

Posted in Research | Leave a Comment »

Invitation to participate in a study on Your Experience in Digital Environments

Posted by CLA Govt Library and Info Mgmt Professionals Network on 2013/03/07

Are you a professional, academic, or graduate student who frequently searches for and monitors information relating to your work or area of research?

We are interested in your perceptions of the digital environments (e.g., websites, intranets) that you use and how these perceptions may be related to your personality traits and work environment.

Please take approximately 15 minutes of your time to respond to our survey. You will have the chance to enter your name in a draw for one of twenty $20 gift certificates for Amazon.ca.

http://projects.cs.dal.ca/infostudy/survey

The study started February 13th, 2013 and will continue until the target number of 300-400 participants is met and may be completed at your convenience.

This survey is part of Lori McCay-Peet’s Ph.D. research at Dalhousie University that is investigating individuals’ experiences in digital environments. This research will help in the development of better digital environments.

Your participation in this study is voluntary and will be kept confidential. You may withdraw at any time.

If you have any questions, please contact Lori McCay-Peet at Dalhousie University: mccay@dal.ca

Lori McCay-Peet (MLIS)
PhD Candidate, Interdisciplinary Studies
Dalhousie University
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Co-supervisors:

Dr. Bertrum MacDonald
School of Information Management
Dalhousie University
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Dr. Elaine G. Toms
Information School
The University of Sheffield
Sheffield, United Kingdom

Posted in Dalhousie SIM, Research | Leave a Comment »

National Statistical and Values Profile of Canadian Libraries: Highlights

Posted by CLA Govt Library and Info Mgmt Professionals Network on 2013/01/30

The Canadian Library Association (CLA) is pleased to launch the National Statistical and Values Profile of Canadian Libraries.

CLA Executive Council, under past-President Karen Adams, commissioned this research to provide CLA members with a current comprehensive overview of the activities of libraries in Canada. The statistics are supported by a compilation of statements from a wide variety of sources on the value that Canada’s libraries bring to society. This research will provide much needed support, in the form of both statistics and testimonials, for CLA’s advocacy initiatives.

Many thanks to Dr Alvin Schrader and Michael Brundin for their work to compile this report.

National Statistical and Values Profile of Canadian Libraries


National Statistical and Values Profile of Canadian Libraries

Alvin M. Schrader and Michael R. Brundin
November 30, 2012

Introduction and Background

We are pleased to submit this final report to CLA Executive Council on the project National Statistical and Values Profile of Canadian Libraries. The report consists of an Executive Summary of findings and methodologies for each of the two principal components of the project—library statistics and library value—together with corresponding detailed appendices, the national statistical profile and the national values profile, that are intended to serve as “raw data” for future analysis, synthesis, review, discussion, refinement, and advocacy efforts.

Early in 2012 the CLA Executive Council endorsed a new mission for the Association as “the national public voice for Canada’s library communities”:

  • We champion library values and the value of libraries.
  • We influence public policy impacting libraries.
  • We inspire and support learning.
  • We collaborate to strengthen the library community.

This project was prompted in part by apprehension about how well the library community could speak to the value of libraries in the face of cuts to Library and Archives Canada, federal government libraries, and school libraries in various provincial jurisdictions, as well as in the face of burgeoning Internet-based sources of both free and “pay-per-view” information.

Prior to the adoption of CLA’s new mission in early 2012, the 2011 transitional Executive Council had become concerned about the absence of national Canadian data supporting the role that the library profession plays in communities, education, government, and business, as well as about the absence of a Canadian document addressing the “value proposition” of Canadian libraries. At the initiative of CLA President Karen Adams, Executive Council approved a contract in June 2012 to gather available statistical information on specified measures of interest and to create a value propositions profile.

The goal of the project was to produce a Canadian snapshot of library data and library meaning for use in CLA’s national advocacy role with elected officials at every level of public affairs, community leaders, government policy makers, and library partners including library user communities and the general public. Information from the report will also be shared on the CLA Web site for all to use selectively as judged relevant to local advocacy and marketing efforts.

Executive Summary: National Statistical Profile

No national statistical profile of library investments and activities has been assembled since the National Core Library Statistics Program (NCLSP), sponsored by the former National Library of Canada, was abandoned in the early 2000s; the last statistical report was for 1999 data, subsequently published in 2002 as National Core Library Statistics Program: Statistical Report, 1999: Cultural and Economic Impact of Libraries on Canada in English and French.

Unlike the NCLSP, the current project relied exclusively on the availability of secondary sources of data already collected by other national, regional, and provincial agencies and library consortia, which in part explains why somewhat fewer measures for the school library sector are reported, and the special library sector is not represented at all except for three “national special” libraries (Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information [CISTI], Library and Archives Canada [LAC], and the Library of Parliament [LofP]). Together, special libraries made up an estimated 3,000 libraries (service points) in 2010 (based on a figure of 3,020, which includes an unstated number of small archives, from the 2010–2011 edition of Libraries Canada; the NCLSP report for 1999 accounted for 2,262 special libraries with 2,549 service points).

It is important, therefore, for readers to be cognizant of which specific library sector or sectors any particular library measure pertains. None of the measures documented in this report represents the entire universe of Canadian libraries; as noted above, excluded are special libraries, with the exception of three national special libraries. Most of the reported measures are available only for public and academic libraries; the report and accompanying spreadsheet are very careful in specifying applicable sector coverage.

Quotable Facts

A snapshot of public, academic, national special, and school libraries in Canada for the latest available reporting year of 2010 (for most of the data) reveals the following patterns of usage, assets, and investments:

  • 360 million visits were made in person to public, academic, and school libraries across Canada
    • 164 million visits were to public libraries
    • 88 million visits were to academic libraries
    • 108 million visits were to school libraries
  • 69 million electronic database sessions were conducted by library users in public, academic, and national special libraries across Canada
    • 18 million sessions by public library users
    • 31 million sessions by academic library users
    • 20 million sessions by national special library users
  • 590 million publications were borrowed for off-site use or consulted on site by library users in public, academic, national special (CISTI, LAC, LofP), and school libraries across Canada (including more than 5 million interlibrary loan transactions, both to and from institutions)
    • 362 million uses of public library items, of which 15% were on site
    • 33 million uses of academic library items, of which 24% were on site
    • 168,000 uses of national special library items, of which 37% were on site
    • 194 million uses of school library items (off-site only)
  • 478 million publications, both print and electronic, were owned or leased by public, academic, national special, and school libraries across Canada
    • 101 million items by public libraries
    • 212 million items by academic libraries
    • 60 million items by national special libraries
    • 105 million items by school libraries
  • 25 million questions were asked by library users in all public and academic libraries across Canada
    • 21.8 million questions by public library users
    • 3.6 million questions by academic library users
  • 8 million library users attended 386,000 programs held by public and academic libraries across Canada
    • 7 million attended 351,000 public library programs
    • 1 million attended 35,000 academic library programs
  • 37,000 staff (FTE) provided user services and products through 19,000 service points managed by 16,000 public, academic, national special, and school libraries across Canada
    • 16,000 staff worked in 3,400 service points managed by 1,700 public libraries
    • 8,000 staff worked in 700 service points managed by 200 academic libraries
    • 2,000 staff worked in 7 service points managed by 3 national special libraries
    • 11,000 staff worked in 14,500 service points managed by 14,500 school libraries
  • 20 million service hours per year were available in public, academic, national special, and school libraries to the people of Canada in all walks of life (397,000 hours per week for 50 weeks)
    • 3 million hours per year in public libraries (61,000 hours per week for 50 weeks)
    • 3 million hours per year in academic libraries (62,000 hours per week for 50 weeks)
    • 14,000 hours per year in national special libraries (268 hours per week for 50 weeks)
    • 14 million hours per year in school libraries (380,000 hours per week for 36 weeks)
  • $3.5 billion were invested in services, products, and capital assets in public, academic, national special, and school libraries across Canada, of which $2.1 billion went to staff and $558 million to library collection acquisitions and database subscriptions
    • $1.5 billion were invested in public libraries, $925 million for staff and $159 million for collections
    • $952 million were invested in academic libraries, $507 million for staff and $332 million for collections
    • $197 million in national special libraries, $136 million for staff and $11 million for collections
    • $896 million in school libraries, $561 million for staff and $56 million for collections

An Executive Summary Table at the end of this report details these statistical measures by library sector.

These key measures can be “sliced and diced” into a myriad of ratios and percentages such as per capita, per library, per day, per month, and combinations thereof. Here are some “Quotable Facts” of interest that try to reduce the magnitudes of these national patterns to more anchored perspectives, which themselves can be rephrased in different ways and recalculated even more times on the basis of individual library sectors. On average:

  • There were 1 million visits to libraries (public, academic, and school) every day of the year in 2010.
  • Every Canadian visited a library once a month in 2010 (11 visits per year).
  • There were 189,000 electronic database sessions conducted in libraries (public, academic and the three national special libraries) every day of the year in 2010.
  • Every Canadian conducted 2 electronic database sessions a year in Canadian libraries in 2010.
  • There were 1.6 million uses of library materials every day of the year in 2010.
  • Every Canadian used at least one library item per month in 2010 (17 library items per year).
  • Print and electronic resources owned and leased by libraries amounted to 14 items per Canadian.
  • Public and academic libraries answered almost 70,000 questions by Canadians every day of the year in 2010.
  • Every Canadian asked one question a year in 2010.
  • 21,000 Canadians attended programs held by public and academic libraries every day in 2010.
  • Libraries in Canada run on 28 cents per day per Canadian, $104 per year per Canadian.
  • 41% of Canadians are active public library cardholders, and an estimated 20% have a library card but haven’t used it in the last three years, for a total of 61% of all Canadians with public library membership.
  • 95% of Canadians had access to local public libraries in 2010.
  • 93% of Canadian schools had libraries in 2004.

Executive Summary: National Values Profile

A forward-thinking innovation in the current project was the introduction of a key feature on library value propositions. Unlike the ability to rely on secondary data sources for library statistics, this component of the project involved primary data collection of a qualitative and narrative nature from a large number of sources. As such, it should be regarded as exploratory and tentative, and feedback is invited for future refinement of the “data” for alignment with current Canadian political words and concepts. Already, the project has convinced one library official that a much better job of keeping track of valuable comments and expressions of local support needs to be addressed. Also unlike the national statistical profile, the values profile includes contributions pertaining to special libraries.

The national values profile “database” consists of a brief “Framework for Thinking about Messaging,” which are suggested (and perhaps idiosyncratic) guidelines for considering and constructing value propositions, together with a series organized by library sector of bulleted listings of “Value Propositions”: libraries in general; academic libraries; school libraries; special libraries; and public libraries. Entries within sectors are grouped loosely into contributions by political and community leaders from all walks of life, by other library supporters, by library user communities, and by library workers; unattributed statements are placed last in each sector. At the end is a listing of sources specifically referenced in the value propositions, but excluded are many other sources that were consulted during the course of the project.

Statements and attributions contributed by third parties are accepted as presented to us and have not been authenticated or permissions to use confirmed. It should also be noted that quotations and texts have been edited or paraphrased for length and flow; original texts should be checked before use for advocacy and marketing, particularly more extended ones that are frequently highly condensed synopses. The emphasis is on Canadian statements but others are included.

The framework for messaging starts with a common understanding of the term “value proposition” as an actionable, credible, succinct, and compelling promise to intended recipients of specific benefits, promises that recipients can visualize and get excited about.

In this context, Stephen Abram has observed, “Statistics aren’t emotionally engaging,” and that librarians should market experiences, not statistics. Raw statistics are just representations of effort, he has also noted. Along similar lines, George Needham said that librarians should “connect the dots for people,” and “talk about the results we get from reading books – not the lending, not the tools, not the assets.”

In a related vein, Kathleen Shearer has written that “the library community seems well disposed to move from basic statistical measures to measures that tie the value of libraries more closely to the benefits they create for their users, thus defining new research objectives for the future.” In other words, sell benefits, not features. And at the risk of a certain authorial conceit, these observations echo remarks made a decade ago in the 1999 NCLSP Report (2002) about the imperative of effective messaging and identity formation:

The biggest challenge facing the library community is telling its story—going beyond the data in meaningful ways that will resonate with sponsors, policy makers, politicians, and library users alike.

Value propositions for academic, school, special, and public libraries in Canada reveal a broad diversity of benefits—individual outcomes and societal impacts—that are not easily summarized or categorized, and assuredly not quantifiable.

Among the most challenging aspects of library value messaging are that:

  • Many profoundly important benefits to individuals and society occur over a much longer period of time than the one-year budget cycle or short-term program offerings, for example, summer reading programs;
  • Learning, however acquired, is elusive, just as information is elusive, and few people ever think about the meaning of either or about the value of library resources;
  • Recent research points to a perception that the library is not making a critical and essential contribution to the issues facing communities today; and,
  • Though supportive of libraries, people are generally unaware of library funding challenges in any of the sectors with which they have direct interaction or personal knowledge.

National Statistical and Values Profile of Canadian Libraries

Posted in Advocacy, Research, Statistics, Value of libraries | Leave a Comment »

Library Value Statements: CLA Project on National Statistical and Values Profile of Canadian Libraries

Posted by CLA Govt Library and Info Mgmt Professionals Network on 2012/10/20

As part of a new project National Statistical and Values Profile of Canadian Libraries, the Canadian Library Association (CLA) is currently gathering statements, testimonials, phrasings, and thoughts about the essential value of libraries to various constituencies including politicians, post-secondary officials, other community leaders, library users, funding agencies, and key librarian leaders.

As project lead for the CLA initiative, I invite you to offer “quotable quotes” for strategic use in CLA advocacy with politicians, policy makers, and the general public; a selection of quotations will also be posted to the CLA web site.

A “quotable quote” could be just one word, a short phrase, or a sentence that captures your basic thoughts and feelings about why libraries are needed – whatever the library sector.

To help you focus your thoughts, you might think about it this way:

  • When you hear the word “library,” what pops into your head?
  • What is the key benefit — or benefits — of having a library in a community – whether that community comprises the general public or a targeted constituency such as post-secondary students/faculty/staff, or a more specialized clientele?

CLA would be very grateful for a personal contribution from you, and from 1 or 2 key leaders with whom you have personal contact.

Your response is needed by October 31, 2012, to Dr Alvin M Schrader at alvin.schrader@ualberta.ca. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments.

Dr Alvin M Schrader
Project Lead

Posted in Advocacy, Research, Statistics | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 484 other followers